Menilik Dominasi Bahasa Mitos Dalam Sosiokultural Sasak

Authors

  • Zainul muttaqin Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Mu’awanah Mu’awanah Universitas Hamzanwadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37216/tarbawi.v5i2.320

Keywords:

Hegemony Process, Language Myth of Rimb Enclosure Queen

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the process of hegemony in the language of Tithe Ringkok Ratu myth in North Masbagik Village. The problem formulation of this research is "how is the process of hegemony in the language of the myth of Timba Lingkok Ratu in North Masbagik Village? To answer the research question above, the researcher conducted the research with qualitative descriptive method and approach with the type of ethnographic research located in North Masbagik Village Masbagik Subdistrict. Furthermore, data collection techniques from this research are observation, interview and documentation. While data analysis is data reduction, data presentation, and withdrawal conclusion.  The results of this study indicate that the process of hegemony in the language  of the myth of Timba Lingkok Ratu in North Masbagik Village begin beliefs that are superstition, then this belief is spread from the mouth of tempest that is by the dominant party (people who hegemonies) to the dihegemoni. Furthermore, languages that are persuasive or affect the dominant party with a style of delivery that is so reliable and with strong evidence. Therefore, it can be concluded that the process of hegemony into the language of Titus Ringkok Ratu in North Masbagik Village is a process of convincing someone who is done by the dominant party to the community against Titus Timba Lingkok Ratu in North Masbagik Village with strong evidences.

References

Achmad, 2014. Pamali & Mitos Jawa Ilmu Kuno Antara Bejo dan Kesenian.Yogyakarta: Araska.

Aini. 2015. Makna Sosial yang Terdapat dalam Mitos Potong Rambut Saat IstriHamil Desa Masbagik Timur. Oleh Jurusan Pendidikan IlmuPengetahuan Sosial STKIP Hamzanwadi Selong.

Arikunto. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

El-Fanani. 2012. 101 Mitos dalam Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Araska.

Emzir, 2012. Metodelogi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif.Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Kurnia, Anton. 2016. Mencari Setangkai Daun Surga. Yogyakarta : PT. IRCiSoD.

Levi-Strauss, 2015. Pengertian Mitos. Diakses pada 08 Agustus 2016 darihttp://fariedmiftah.blogspot.co.id/2015/02/strukturalisme-levi-straussmitos-dan.html.

Moleong,2013. Metodologi Penelitian Kulitatif. Bandung Pt. Remaja RosdaKarya.

Parman, 1988. Kumpulan Mitos Sasak. Mataram : LPP Adat Sasak.

Puspitarini. 2014. Hegemoni Mitos Nyai Roro Kidul terhadap Kekuasaan Jawadalam Novel Sang Nyai Karya Budi Sardjono. Oleh Jurusan SastraFakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro.

Setiawan, 2015. Bentuk Makna dan Sesaji Mahase Lawung dalam Tradisi Ritualdi Keraton Surakarta Hadiningrat. Oleh Fakultas Bahasa dan SeniUniversitas Negeri Malang.

Sujarwa, 2010. Mitos dibalik Kisah-Kisah Sinetron dalam Perspektif Hegemonidan Kapitalisasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suprapto. 2015. Ada Mitos dalam D.K.V. Jakarta : PT Lintas Kreasi Imaji.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-07

How to Cite

muttaqin, Zainul, and Mu’awanah Mu’awanah. “Menilik Dominasi Bahasa Mitos Dalam Sosiokultural Sasak”. Jurnal Penelitian Tarbawi: Pendidikan Islam dan Isu-Isu Sosial 5, no. 2 (September 7, 2020): 45-54. Accessed December 3, 2020. http://jurnal.iaihnwpancor.ac.id/index.php/tarbawi/article/view/320.